0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 12:35:55 UTC 2026 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.10/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.10/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5dW7FzAzFx/E---3.1_2304.p 0.18/0.49 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSLSMSSSNHFA. 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % full_lambda_9 with pid 2320 completed with status 0 0.18/0.49 % Result found by full_lambda_9 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSLSMSSSNHFA. 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)) 0.18/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true) 0.18/0.49 % Search class: HGHSM-FFLM31-DHFFFFBN 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): HGHSM-FFLM31-DSFFFFBN 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.18/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2321 completed with status 0 0.18/0.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSLSMSSSNHFA. 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Starting full_lambda_9 with 180s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true)) 0.18/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4,,3,20000,3.0,true) 0.18/0.49 % Search class: HGHSM-FFLM31-DHFFFFBN 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): HGHSM-FFLM31-DSFFFFBN 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.18/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s 0.18/0.49 0.18/0.49 % Proof found! 0.18/0.49 % SZS status Theorem 0.18/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.18/0.49 thf(decl_51, type, mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET: $o). 0.18/0.49 thf(thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH, conjecture, (mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5dW7FzAzFx/E---3.1_2304.p', thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH)). 0.18/0.49 thf(thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF, axiom, (![X32:$o]:(((X32)<=>(X32)))<=>(mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5dW7FzAzFx/E---3.1_2304.p', thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF)). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~((mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~(mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_4, plain, (![X32:$o]:(($true))<=>(mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_6, plain, (mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~((mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_8, plain, (mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.18/0.49 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])]), ['proof']). 0.18/0.49 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.18/0.49 % Parsed axioms : 218 0.18/0.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 164 0.18/0.49 % Initial clauses : 137 0.18/0.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 30 0.18/0.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 107 0.18/0.49 % Processed clauses : 4 0.18/0.49 % ...of these trivial : 0 0.18/0.49 % ...subsumed : 1 0.18/0.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 2 0.18/0.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.18/0.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.18/0.49 % Backward-subsumed : 0 0.18/0.49 % Backward-rewritten : 0 0.18/0.49 % Generated clauses : 0 0.18/0.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.18/0.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.18/0.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.18/0.49 % Paramodulations : 0 0.18/0.49 % Factorizations : 0 0.18/0.49 % NegExts : 0 0.18/0.49 % Equation resolutions : 0 0.18/0.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0 0.18/0.49 % Total rewrite steps : 1 0.18/0.49 % ...of those cached : 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional check models : 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional clauses : 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.18/0.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.18/0.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.18/0.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 2 0.18/0.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1 0.18/0.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.18/0.49 % Negative unit clauses : 1 0.18/0.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.18/0.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 103 0.18/0.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 262 0.18/0.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.18/0.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 0.18/0.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.18/0.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.18/0.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.18/0.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.18/0.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.18/0.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 0.18/0.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 0.18/0.49 % Condensation attempts : 0 0.18/0.49 % Condensation successes : 0 0.18/0.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 21632 0.18/0.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2814 0.18/0.49 0.18/0.49 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.49 % User time : 0.010 s 0.18/0.49 % System time : 0.004 s 0.18/0.49 % Total time : 0.014 s 0.18/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 4640 pages 0.18/0.49 0.18/0.49 % ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.49 % User time : 0.017 s 0.18/0.49 % System time : 0.010 s 0.18/0.49 % Total time : 0.027 s 0.18/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages 0.18/0.49 % E exiting 0.18/0.49 EOF